課程資訊
課程名稱
 佔領運動專題
Seminar on Occupy Movements 
開課學期
 111-1 
授課對象
 社會科學院  社會學研究所  
授課教師
 何明修 
課號
 Soc7085 
課程識別碼
 325 M7410 
班次
  
學分
 3.0 
全/半年
 半年 
必/選修
 選修 
上課時間
 星期二7,8,9(14:20~17:20) 
上課地點
 社110 
備註
 限學士班三年級以上
總人數上限：15人
外系人數限制：4人 
  
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
 核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

晚近以來，世界各地都爆發了大規模佔領運動，引發與政府當局的持久對峙與嚴重政治危機。從雅典的憲法廣場、開羅的解放廣場、馬德里的太陽門廣場、紐約的華爾街、伊斯坦堡的Taksim廣場、基輔的獨立廣場、香港的金鐘、台灣的立法院，佔領抗議者之身影，已經在國際媒體廣為傳播，並且帶來重大的社會與政治衝擊。
全球佔領運動有下列的共同特徵：共同的特徵在於缺乏大型組織之動員、高度依賴數位通訊科技、自發性的群眾參與、多元而異質的訴求、面臨經濟困頓的青年群體等。埃及革命的參與者Wael Ghonim，曾指出現代的革命不再需要領導者，只需要「依循群眾的智慧」，因此帶來「第二代革命」（Revolution 2.0）的新時代。 

課程目標
 這一門課將要回顧晚近的研究文獻，這門課程所規劃的主題，主要可以分為下列的幾個面向：
(1)佔領運動的意義：大規模的佔領運動意味民主體制的解體、人民對於政治制度的不信？亦或是公民力量的覺醒，訴求直接民主風潮之興起？
(2)佔領運動的起源：新的傳播科技扮演了何種的作用？國際擴散是否有助於相似的行動產生？青年世代的覺醒與其經濟不滿扮演了何種角色？
(3)佔領運動的過程：要如何維持長期抗爭的參與？執政者又是如何因應佔領運動所帶來的危機？
(4)佔領運動的後果：佔領風潮是否有可能轉化成為體制內的參與？從抗議到組黨參選，所可能面臨挑戰與危險何在？ 
課程要求
 二、授課方式
這一門研究所的課程，除了講員授課以外，我期待學生自發性地提出問題，無論是針對講員的授課內容疑義，或是個人心得分享。主動提問與發表看法，不僅是學生的受教權益，也會影響課堂表現的分數。
指定讀物是每次授課的主要內容，希望學生能在上課前先抽空閱讀其內容。每週的讀物都要有學生負責口頭報告，並且準備簡單的書面內容。負責同學除了整理、說明讀物的內容主旨以外，更要加以評論、發表個人感想、提供課堂討論的主題。我會期待同學能夠在課堂報告之前，能夠充份準備，自行將必要的背景知識補足。
為了鼓勵所有同學事先閱讀的習慣，並且避免淪為只有負責口頭報告同學有讀的不良風氣，上課同學最少要繳交8次的「隨堂心得」。「隨堂心得」是針對每週指定閱讀內容(不得與負責口頭報告的內容一樣)的個人提問，其內容務必精簡，篇幅不超過200字。在每週一晚上十點之前，需要將該週「隨堂心得」發表到指定地方（已開設於討論區），其內容將會成為上課討論的一部分。
期中與期末有兩次的「讀書心得」，每次不得少於4,000字。其內容需要是與課程指定閱讀內容有關，或其運用延伸。讀書心得可以用「研究紀要」(research note)的方式撰寫，建議以課程臚列的相關參考文獻找寫作的靈感或題材。
如果涉及抄襲，依校規處理。第一次讀書心得報告不得晚於第9週(11/6)，第二次不得晚於第18週(1/8)，請用email繳交。
每週進行方式如下：
(1)第一堂課：講員簡介(5分鐘)、口頭報告I(20分鐘)、課堂討論(25分鐘)。
(2)第二堂課：口頭報告II(20分鐘)、課堂討論(30分鐘)。
(3)第三堂課：「隨堂心得」之討論(50分鐘)
本課程的指定閱讀之電子檔都放在NTU-COOL。 
預期每週課後學習時數
  
Office Hours
 另約時間 備註： 週四下午一點至三點(請先預約) 
指定閱讀
  
參考書目
 見每週進度
[*為指定閱讀，其他則是延伸閱讀] 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
  
No.
項目
百分比
說明
1. 
 課堂討論與參與 
20% 
  
2. 
 口頭報告 
20% 
  
3. 
 隨堂心得 
20% 
  
4. 
 兩次讀書心得報告 
40% 
  
 
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題
第1週
 9/6  課程導論

遠距學生可從以下會議鏈結加入
https://ntucc.webex.com/ntucc/j.php?MTID=m1f852e98bb7b249c305e92d5417bf021
或
access code： JYcbMumA236 
第2週
 9/13  民主的危機或轉機
*Krastev, Ivan. 2014. Democracy Disrupted: The Politics of Global Protest. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 1-32.
*della Porta, Donatella. 2016. Where did the Revolution Go? Contentious Politics and the Quality of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-36.
della Porta, Donatella. 2014. Mobilizing for Democracy: Comparing 1989 and 2011. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hardt, Michael and Antonio Negri. 2017. Assembly. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 
第3週
 9/20  「因教師出國，停課一次」 
第4週
 9/27  民粹主義亦或是公民參與
* della Porta, Donatella. 2020. How Social Movements Can Save Democracy. Oxford: Polity Press, pp. 1-23.
*Gerbaudo, Paulo. 2017. The Mask and the Flag: Populism, Citizenism, and Global Protest. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1-27.
Carothers, Thomas and Richard Youngs. 2015. The Complexities of Global Protests. DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Mason, Paul. 2012. Why It’s Kicking Off Everywhere: The New Global Revolutions. London: Verso. 
第5週
 10/04  佔領運動的意識型態根源
*Juris, Jeffrey. 2008. Networking Futures: The Movement against Corporate Globalization. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp.1-26.
*Bayat, Asef. 2017. Revolution without Revolutionaries: Making Sense of the Arab Spring. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 1-27.
Noueihed, Lin and Alex Warren. 2012. The Battle for the Arab Spring: Revolution, Counter-Revolution and the Making of a New Era. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Rand, Dafna Hochman. 2013. Roots of the Arab Spring: Contested Authority and Political Change in the Middle East. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 
第6週
 10/11  數位通訊科技與運動動員(I)
*Castells, Manuel. 2012. Network of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Oxford: Polity Press, pp. 218-243.
*Bennett, W. Lance and Alexandra Segerbert. 2013. The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19-54.
Howard, Philip N. 2010. The Digital Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shirky, Clay. 2008. Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations. New York: Penguin. 
第7週
 10/18  數位通訊科技與運動動員(II)
*Gerbaudo, Paolo. 2012. Tweets and the Streets: Social Media and Contemporary Activism. New York: Pluto Press, pp. 1-47.
*Heaney, Michael T. 2020. “Protest at the Center of American Politics.” Journal of International Affairs 73(2): 195-208.
Earl, Jennifer and Katrina Kimport. 2011 Digitally Enabled Social Change: Activism in the Internet Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lee, Francis L.F. and Joseph M. Chan. 2018. Media and Protest Logics in the Digital Era: The Umbrella Movement in Hong Kong. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 
第8週
 10/25  數位通訊科技與運動動員(III)
*Shradie, Jen. 2019. The Revolution that Wasn’t: How Digital Activism Favors Conservatives. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1-83.
Tufekci, Zeynep. 2017. Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Lei, Ya-wen. 2018. The Contentious Public Sphere: Law, Media and Authoritarian Rule in China. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 
第9週
 11/01  青年世代、經濟不滿與抗爭運動
*Tejerin, Benjamín et al., 2013. “From Indignation to Occupation: A New Wave of Global Mobilization.” Current Sociology 61(4) 377-392.
*Milkman, Ruth. 2017. “A New Political Generation: Millennials and the Post-2008 Wave of Protest.” American Sociological Review 82(1): 1-31.
*Ho, Ming-sho. 2020. “From Unionism to Youth Activism: Taiwan’s Politics of Working Hours.” China Information 34(3): 406-426.
Standing, Guy. 2011. The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury.
della Porta, Donatella. 2015. Social Movements in Times of Austerity: Bringing Capitalism Back into Protest Analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Joo, Yunjeong. 2018. “Same Despair but Different Hope: Youth Activism in East Asia and Contentious Politics.” Development and Society 47(3): 401-421. 
第10週
 11/08  佔領運動的組織起源
*Fominaya, Christina Flesher. 2014. “Debunking Spontaneity: Spain’s 15-M/Indignados as Autonomous Movement.” Social Movement Studies 14(2): 142-163.
*Clarke, Killian. 2014. “Unexpected Brokers of Mobilization: Contingency and Networks in the 2011 Egyptian Uprising.” Comparative Politics 46(4): 379-94.
Holmes, Amy Austin. 2012. “There are Weeks When Decades Happen: Structure and Strategy in the Egyptian Revolution.” Mobilization 17(4): 391-410.
Gunning, Jeroen and Ilan Zyi Baron. 2014. Why Occupy a Square: People, Protests and Movements in the Egyptian Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 
第11週
 11/15  數據行動主義：佔領運動與佔領之後
*Postill, John. 2018. The Rise of Nerd Politics: Digital Activism and Political Change. New York: Pluto Press, pp. 1-27, 121-142.
*Lee, Mei-chun. 2020. “Free the Data from the Birdcage: Opening Up Data and Crowdsourcing Activism in Taiwan.” Political and Legal Anthropology Review, DOI: 10.1111/plar.12371.
Fan, Fa-ti et al. 2019. “Citizens, Politics, and Civic Technology: A Conversation with g0v and EDGI.” East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal 13(2): 279-297.
Tang, Audrey. 2019. “A Strong Democracy is a Digital Democracy.” New York Times, Oct, 15. 
第12週
 11/22  佔領運動與政權的互動
*Ketchley, Neil. 2017. Egypt in a Time of Revolution: Contentious Politics and the Arab Spring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.1-77
Cheng, Edmund W. and Samson Yuen. 2017. “Neither Repression nor Concession? A Regime’s Attrition against Massive Protests.” Political Studies 65(1): 1-20.
Cai, Yongshu. 2017. The Occupy Movement in Hong Kong: Sustaining Decentralized Protest. London: Routeldge. 
第13週
 11/29  佔領運動與日常政治(I)
*Tominaga, Kyoko. 2017. “Social Reproduction and the Limitation of Protest Camps: Openness and Exclusion of Social Movements in Japan.” Social Movement Studies 16(3): 269-82.
*Ho, Ming-sho. 2019. Challenging Beijing’s Mandate of Heaven: Taiwan’s Sunflower Movement and Hong Kong’s Umbrella Movement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, pp. 150-175.
Graeber, David. 2009. Direct Action: An Ethnography. Oakland, CA: AK Press.
Ehrenreich, Barbara. 2015. 《嘉年華的誔生：慶典、舞會、演唱會、運動會如何翻轉世界》，胡訢諄譯。台北：左岸。 
第14週
 12/06  佔領運動與日常政治(II)
*Tang, Thomas Yun-tong and Michelle W. T. Cheng. 2022. “The Politicization of Everyday Life: Understanding the Impact of the 2019 Anti-Extradition Law Amendment Bill Protests on Pro-democracy Protesters’ Political Participation in Hong Kong.” Critical Asian Studies, https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2022.2027257.
*Cheng Sealing. 2020. “Pikachu’s Tears: Children's Perspectives on Violence in Hong Kong.” Feminist Studies 46(1): 216-225.
*Ho, Ming-sho and Wei An Chen. 2021. “Peddling the Revolution? How Hong Kong’s Protesters became Online Vendors in Taiwan.” Made in China Journal 6(3): 94-99.
Gitlin, Todd. 2012. Occupy Nation: The Roots, the Spirit, and the Promise of Occupy Wall Street. New York: Harper Collins.
Inter-Asia Cultural Studies’ special issue on “Hong Kong at Crossroads” (2015), volume 16, issue 3. 
第15週
 12/13  佔領運動的參與
*Cheng, Edmund W. et al. 2022. “Total Mobilization from Below: Hong Kong’s Freedom Summer.” China Quarterly, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741022000236.
*Beissinger, Mark R. 2013. “The Semblance of Democratic Revolution: Coalitions in Ukraine’s Orange Revolution.” American Political Science Review 107(3): 574-92.
Maeckelbergh, Marianne. 2012. “Horizontal Democracy Now: From Alterglobalization to Occupation.” Interface 4(1): 207-234.
Ghonim, Wael. 2012. Revolution 2.0: The Power of the People Is Greater Than the People in Power. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Wilson, Andrew. 2005. Ukraine’s Orange Revolution. New Have, CT: Yale University Press. 
第16週
 12/20  創意、自我表達與佔領運動
*Veg, Sebastian. 2016. “Creating a Textual Public Space: Slogans and Texts from Hong Kong’s Umbrella Movement.” Journal of Asian Studies 75(3): 673-702.
*Li, Yao-Tai and Katherine Whitworth. 2022. “Contentious Repertoires: Examining Lennon Walls in Hong Kong’s Social Unrest of 2019.” Journal of Contemporary Asia, https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2022.2032277.
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2011. Performative Revolution in Egypt: An Essay in Cultural Power. London: Bloomsbury.
Jasper, James M. 2014. Protest: A Cultural Introduction to Social Movements. Oxford: Polity Press. 
第17週
 12/27  從佔領到選舉
*Fominaya, Cristina Flesher. 2020. Democracy Reloaded: Inside Spain’s Political Laboratory from 15-M to Podemos. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 221-281.
*Ho, Ming-sho and Chun-hao Huang. 2017. “Movement Parties in Taiwan (1987-2016): A Political Opportunity Explanation.” Asian Survey 57(2): 343-367.
Alimi, Eitan Y. et al. (eds.). 2016. Popular Contention, Regime, and Transition: Arab Revolts in Comparative Global Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McAdam, Doug and Karina Kloos. 2014. Deeply Divided: Racial Politics and Social Movements in Post-war America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Youngs, Richard (ed.). 2019. After Protest: Pathways Beyond Mass Mobilization. DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.